>> RFC-2518, example in section 8.10.8, and description of DAV:lockdiscovery in section 13.8 mention a "timeout type" for a LOCK. As far as I can tell, the example doesn't show any kind of "timeout type" (particularly the one it says it shows), and I don't see a description of "timeout type" elsewhere in RFC-2518. Perhaps the "timeout type" is a holdover from an earlier draft and just needs an editorial cleansing? >> Presumably. Yaron probably knows. I've put it on the locking issues list. If he doesn't speak up I'll look into it later.Received on Saturday, 22 January 2000 12:38:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:53 GMT