W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: Should I use displayname?

From: Geoffrey M. Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 13:57:52 -0500
Message-Id: <10001211857.AA26628@tantalum>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

I vote for choice 2, since choice 1 is so egregiously bad.

Cheers,
Geoff

   From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
   Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:49:46 -0800
   Content-Length: 708

   Jason writes:
   > Note: in the presence of multiple bindings, if the server initializes it
   > to the URI and treats it as a dead property, that URI might be different
   > from the URI from which it was accessed.

   Hmm, since properties are part of the state of the resource, in the presence
   of bindings it is more than possible for there to be multiple URI names for
   the same "display name".  This removes the value of the displayname
   property.  Some solutions:

   1) move displayname to the collection, and have the collection maintain
   displayname/binding pairs (this solution seems icky to me)

   2) deprecate displayname, and only use URIs for display to the user, and
   concentrate on i18n support for URIs.

   - Jim
Received on Friday, 21 January 2000 13:58:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:53 GMT