W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2000

RE: WebDAV Bindings - Issue Yaron.Insulting2616

From: Yaron Goland <yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:05:27 -0800
Message-ID: <7DE119D3D0E15543874F7561EECBDBED0261A0BC@BEG.platinum.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "'Jim Whitehead'" <ejw@ics.uci.edu>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Cc: Roy Fielding <fielding@ics.uci.edu>
With all due respect, I think ALL of the 2616 authors should have a chance
to respond as they all are indicted by your comments.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Whitehead [mailto:ejw@ics.uci.edu]
Sent: Mon, January 17, 2000 11:26 AM
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Cc: Roy Fielding
Subject: RE: WebDAV Bindings - Issue Yaron.Insulting2616

I currently have an email pending with Roy Fielding asking him about this
- Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Yaron Goland
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 9:43 AM
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Subject: WebDAV Bindings - Issue Yaron.Insulting2616

The language used in the first paragraph of section 6 makes certain
assertions regarding the intentions of the authors of RFC 2616 that I
believe may not necessarily be accurate. As such I move that the authors of
the BIND spec send an e-mail to all the authors of RFC 2616 and ask them to
validate the accuracy of the proposed language.
Received on Monday, 17 January 2000 15:06:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:21 UTC