- From: Jim Davis <jrd3@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 23:21:06 +0100
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
At 09:48 AM 1/4/00 -0800, Yaron Goland wrote: >So Spoke Jim Davis: > >>... are we trying to >> retroactively induce a consistent conceptual model for something that >> already exists, or design something for the future? >> >My own goal would be to establish what the object model for DAV SHOULD be. >If that requires us to violate RFC 2518, so be it. That is why it is called >a Proposed Standard. That means it can and will change. But, BTW, we should >not be too ready to change RFC 2518. If we do we will be required, if not by >IETF process then by common sense/market pressures, to make changes in such >a way that RFC 2518 clients/servers can continue to operate correctly. Great, that's just how I see it too. So on with the precepts then.
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2000 02:04:15 UTC