W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 1999

RE: Creating a lock-null in a locked collection

From: Yaron Goland (Exchange) <yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 12:04:22 -0800
Message-ID: <7DE119D3D0E15543874F7561EECBDBED02619DE5@BEG.platinum.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "'Joe Orton'" <joe@orton.demon.co.uk>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
The depth 0 lock controls the ability to add level 1 children to the
A lock null resource is a resource and hence is a member of whatever
collections it exists within.
Therefore to create a lock null resource as a level 1 child of a collection
with a depth 0 lock one must have the depth 0 lock.

In other words, yes, you must submit the token on the LOCK on /foo/bar.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Orton [mailto:joe@orton.demon.co.uk]
> Sent: Thu, December 30, 1999 6:45 AM
> To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> Subject: Creating a lock-null in a locked collection
> I have an depth 0 write lock on /foo/. If I do LOCK /foo/bar 
> to create a
> lock-null resource, do I need to submit the locktoken for /foo/ in the
> LOCK request? Or only in the PUT to /foo/bar later?
> (Or is it decided that lock-null resources are going to go away?)
> joe
Received on Thursday, 30 December 1999 15:09:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:19 UTC