Did section 8.10.6 of 2518 meant to say that an exclusive lock will fail if there already is a lock *of that locktype* on that resource, or if there is *any* exclusive lock there? I can see arguments for both directions, and implementors probably haven't thought that much about it since everybody is just doing write locks, but I assume the authors had one or the other in mind? Cheers, GeoffReceived on Monday, 27 December 1999 16:39:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:52 GMT