W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 1999

RE: LOCK request body?

From: <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 08:55:56 -0500
To: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Message-ID: <85256833.004C805F.00@D51MTA03.pok.ibm.com>

  > On a slightly different topic: why is a refresh done using locktokens
  > gathered from the If: header, rather than the more obvious Lock-Token:
  > header?

  I can't recall our original rationale.  We might have been thinking that,
  since the lock had to exist for the request to be honored, this
effectively
  made the locks existence a precondition, and preconditions are expressed
  using the If header.

So do we need to define server behavior if more than one lock is specified
in the If header?
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 1999 08:55:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:52 GMT