W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: Jigsaw release

From: David Sussman <davids@ipona.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 10:24:12 -0000
Message-ID: <6253BCF3E25DD2118F0A00AA00AE6AAA03BE6D@tigger>
To: "'w3c-dist-auth@w3.org'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Ahh, I see. I assumed there was some reason for it, and performance is a
good enough one! My first thoughts were that it seemed odd that you were
implementing something similar, and maybe duplicating effort.

Thanks

Dave



Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> wrote in message
news:<6553BCF3E25DD2118F0A00AA00AE6AAA178F10@tigger>...
> 
> > I've just seen the details for the new release of the W3C server -
> > Jigsaw and spotted the details of the XML format and the
> administration
> > protocol (http://www.w3.org/Jigsaw/Doc/Programmer/JigXML.html). Is
it
> > just me or is this not in DAV format? Does this seem a bit strange?
> > 
> > I'm generally just a snooper in the mailing list, but this confused
> me.
> 
> Jigsaw is not using DAV but a format that is more suited to a fast
> serialization/deserialization scheme. The fact that the admin protocol
> is
> using the same language is just legacy from the previous version and
> actually we are thinking about using it for the admin protocols. The
2.1
> track is meant to change with the possibility to do incompatible
changes
> like upgrading the admin protocol ;)
> 
>       /\          - Yves Lafon - World Wide Web Consortium - 
>   /\ /  \        Architecture Domain - Jigsaw Activity Leader
>  /  \    \/\    
> /    \   /  \   http://www.w3.org/People/Lafon - ylafon@w3.org    
> 
Received on Friday, 5 November 1999 07:00:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:52 GMT