W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: PROPPATCH Error minimization

From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 01:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
To: ccjason@us.ibm.com
cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9910110131300.6085-100000@nebula.lyra.org>
On Fri, 8 Oct 1999 ccjason@us.ibm.com wrote:
>   <gc>
>   I'd suggest we just make it clear that these
>   optimizations are not allowed.  They save some
>   bandwidth over the wire, but would complicate both server and client
>   implementations.
>   </gc>
> 
> All of them?
>    Even if "200 OK"?
> Do we have consensus?

Stripping the response down to just a "200 OK" from a multistatus would be
a Serious Pain.

I'd vote against this kind of response compression.

Cheers,
-g

--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Monday, 11 October 1999 04:32:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:52 GMT