> From: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com> > jamsden@us.ibm.com wrote: > > > The problems we're having result from > > mixing the semantics of: > > 1. a resource and its contents/properties > > 2. URLs we use to access a resource. > > This is probably unavoidable--as far as HTTP is concerned, a resource has no > identity apart from its URL. > Yes, but we are talking about extending HTTP (in a backward compatible way). So just because HTTP-1.1 clients do not have any way of identifying a resource other than its URL, does not imply that the same is true for clients and servers that understand an extension of HTTP-1.1. In particular, the advanced collection protocol proposes a GUID property, as does the versioning protocol. Cheers, GeoffReceived on Friday, 24 September 1999 15:05:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:51 GMT