- From: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 21:11:17 -0400
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Greg Stein wrote: > That leads me to believe that > locks MUST NOT move with the resource It occurs to me that the biggest reason you'd want to MOVE the lock is because you want to keep control over the resource in the new location. Couldn't you do that by locking the destination and then MOVEing the resource? -- /==============================================================\ |John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.| |Chief Scientist |=============================================| |eCal Corp. |NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed by| |francis@ecal.com|its lack of scalability. --John Kirch | \==============================================================/
Received on Friday, 10 September 1999 21:11:47 UTC