W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 1999

RE: Bindings, Locks, and MOVE

From: <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 22:57:25 -0400
To: "Yaron Goland (Exchange)" <yarong@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org, jamsden@us.ibm.com, "'Slein, Judith A'" <JSlein@crt.xerox.com>
Message-ID: <852567E8.000F8D5F.00@D51MTA07.pok.ibm.com>


I'm not sure if it was even an doubted, but I agree with Yaron that we must say
that locks either MUST move as a result of the MOVE or that they MUST NOT move
as a result of a MOVE operation.

------------------------------------------
Phone: 914-784-7569,   ccjason@us.ibm.com

Received on Thursday, 9 September 1999 22:50:14 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Geoffrey M. Clemm: "Re: Bindings, Locks, and MOVE"
Previous message: ccjason@us.ibm.com: "Protected URI's wes: Bindings, Locks, and MOVE"
Maybe in reply to: Slein, Judith A: "Bindings, Locks, and MOVE"
Next in thread: jamsden@us.ibm.com: "Re: Bindings, Locks, and MOVE"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:51 GMT