W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 1999

RE: Bindings, Locks, and MOVE

From: Ray Patch <raypa@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 10:15:57 -0700
Message-ID: <C183CC073051D31184DA0008C707BBF0234A86@RED-MSG-41>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

How do I get removed from this DL?

Thanks,
Ray Patch
Raypa@microsoft.com <mailto:Raypa@microsoft.com> 


		-----Original Message-----
		From:	John Stracke [mailto:francis@ecal.com]
		Sent:	Friday, September 03, 1999 8:00 AM
		To:	w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
		Subject:	Re: Bindings, Locks, and MOVE

		jamsden@us.ibm.com wrote:

		> Proposed extensions to PROPPATCH:
		>
		> 1. Extend the DAV:set and DAV:remove elements to include
information describing
		> how the client wishes to handle errors. The DTD additions
would be:

		I like this idea; I just have a syntactic quibble:

		> <!ELEMENT mustsucceed (#PCDATA | href+)>
		>
		> If an updatebehavior is not included, it is equivalent to
specifying
		> <mustsucceed>*</mustsucceed>

		It might be better if, rather than using "*", you defined an
<all/> element meaning
		the same thing.  For now, "*" is simple enough; but, if we
add more wildcards
		eventually, then it gets messier; we'd have to add more
possible values, which
		starts getting into defining a separate syntax, with a
separate parser.  Simpler to
		use XML tags and let the existing parser handle it.

		--
	
/============================================================\
		|John Stracke    |http://www.ecal.com|My opinions are my
own.|
		|Chief Scientist
|===========================================|
		|eCal Corp.      |Campbell's has it wrong--it's "Never
|
		|francis@ecal.com|underestimate the power of *chocolate*".
|
	
\============================================================/

		
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 1999 13:17:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:51 GMT