W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 1999

Re: Bindings, Locks, and MOVE

From: <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 13:32:07 -0400
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Message-ID: <852567E1.0061EC24.00@d54mta03.raleigh.ibm.com>


* was used to be consistent with the current DAV:keepalive element used by COPY
and MOVE.





John Stracke <francis@ecal.com> on 09/03/99 10:59:36 AM

To:   w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
cc:

Subject:  Re: Bindings, Locks, and MOVE




jamsden@us.ibm.com wrote:

> Proposed extensions to PROPPATCH:
>
> 1. Extend the DAV:set and DAV:remove elements to include information
describing
> how the client wishes to handle errors. The DTD additions would be:

I like this idea; I just have a syntactic quibble:

> <!ELEMENT mustsucceed (#PCDATA | href+)>
>
> If an updatebehavior is not included, it is equivalent to specifying
> <mustsucceed>*</mustsucceed>

It might be better if, rather than using "*", you defined an <all/> element
meaning
the same thing.  For now, "*" is simple enough; but, if we add more wildcards
eventually, then it gets messier; we'd have to add more possible values, which
starts getting into defining a separate syntax, with a separate parser.  Simpler
to
use XML tags and let the existing parser handle it.

--
/============================================================\
|John Stracke    |http://www.ecal.com|My opinions are my own.|
|Chief Scientist |===========================================|
|eCal Corp.      |Campbell's has it wrong--it's "Never       |
|francis@ecal.com|underestimate the power of *chocolate*".   |
\============================================================/
Received on Friday, 3 September 1999 13:49:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:51 GMT