W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 1999

Re: Issue #5: compound DAV:resourcetype property for references.

From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 14:10:30 -0800
To: WEBDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <034701be69b0$7a91f920$d115c380@galileo.ics.uci.edu>
Caught by the spam filter.

- Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: John Stracke [mailto:francis@ecal.com]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 1999 10:20 AM
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Subject: [Moderator Action] Re: Issue #5: compound DAV:resourcetype
property for references.


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Jim Davis <jdavis@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 10:03:30 PST

>but as for the reftarget, my intuition says it does not part of the "type".
> if I have two different references, with different targets, but otherwise
>the same (both are direct references with no integrity) then they should be
>exactly the same "resourcetype".

I agree.  The reftarget is more like content.  The way I think of it is
that, if two objects have different types, you may require different code to
work with them.  Different reftargets don't require different code.


--
/=============================================================\
|John Stracke    | My opinions are my own | S/MIME & HTML OK  |
|francis@ecal.com|============================================|
|Chief Scientist | NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed |
|eCal, Inc.      |  by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch |
\=============================================================/

--
Received on Monday, 8 March 1999 17:26:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:49 GMT