- From: John Stracke <francis@netscape.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 15:59:58 -0800
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
(Whoops--I set the Reply-To: on my last post so that I would get replies after I left Netscape; but I just realized it'll make it hard for some people to reply to the list. So I'm resending.) Larry Masinter wrote: > If support for structured documents is needed for > interoperable > clients, then it should only be "optional" in the sense of > another > set of collective features which form yet another standard > for > which 'conformance implies interoperability'. > I'm wondering whether we actually want a new structured-document model. Rhetorical question: What's wrong with multipart/related? -- /=====================================================================\ |John (Francis) Stracke |My opinions are my own.|S/MIME supported | |Software Retrophrenologist|==========================================| |Netscape Comm. Corp. |In the long run, there is no middle ground| |francis@netscape.com | between justice and genocide. | \=====================================================================/
Received on Tuesday, 12 January 1999 19:00:01 UTC