- From: Lisa Lippert (Dusseault) (Exchange) <lisal@exchange.microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:30:07 -0800
- To: "'James.Anderson@mecomnet.de'" <James.Anderson@mecomnet.de>, WEBDAV?WG? <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
In the collection properties draft, both "folders" and "structured documents" are types of collection. They differ in how they are intended to be displayed. Lisa -----Original Message----- From: james anderson [mailto:James.Anderson@mecomnet.de] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 1999 11:38 AM To: WEBDAVWG Subject: Re: structured documents [draft-hopmann-collection-props-00.txt] yes, i meant a "class hierarchy". John Stracke wrote: > > Jim Whitehead wrote: > > > > for > > > instance, is the intended hierarchy > > > collection > > > structured-document > > > directory > > > or is it > > > collection > > > structured-document > > > directory > > > ? > > > > I don't follow this, since my understanding of what is meant by structured > > document in the WebDAV sense isn't covered by these two cases. > > I think he means class heirarchy, not namespace heirarchy. My sense is that > the latter form is the correct class heirarchy.
Received on Tuesday, 12 January 1999 17:30:09 UTC