W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 1999

Re: New status code: unordered collection

From: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 17:30:34 +0000
Message-ID: <3742F53A.39233960@ecal.com>
To: WEBDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Yaron Goland wrote:

> The problem is that the argument you make for allowing this new code is
> recursive. The next group will come and say they want to just ship and can't
> we wait to solve this number problem until the next group and so on and so
> on. We have to draw the line somewhere and I think the advanced collection
> spec is a fine place to draw that line.

I agree.  Besides, this shouldn't hold up the AdvCol spec too long, should it?
It's fairly simple to specify (admittedly, it adds a little extra work to the
client implementation; but not much--you've got to have an XML parser anyway).

If we wind up doing a common root element, I like Lisa's <DAV:errors> element.

|John Stracke    | My opinions are my own | S/MIME & HTML OK  |
|Chief Scientist | NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed |
|eCal Corp.      |  by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch |
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 1999 13:30:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:19 UTC