Re: Advanced collections and ordering

Jim Davis wrote:

> 1) It's an unreasonable burden on the server.  it's just as easy for the
> client to sort as for he server to sort,

True--either way, you're going to bring down the entire results of PROPFIND.

> > (A nice DASL extension might be a way for the client to tell the
> >server, "I
> >expect to make this query frequently; you might want to keep an index for
> it.")
>
> That's an interesting idea but I hope you won't be offended if I ask to put
> it off until the base level of DASL is done.

Absolutely.  :-)

--
/=============================================================\
|John Stracke    | My opinions are my own | S/MIME & HTML OK  |
|francis@ecal.com|============================================|
|Chief Scientist | NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed |
|eCal Corp.      |  by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch |
\=============================================================/