Jim Whitehead wrote: > This was put into the DAV spec. because the XML Namespace recommendation > doesn't provide any normative rules for how to concatenate a namespace with > an element name. I withdraw all my ordered-pair comments; they were based on an earlier version of the namespace spec. (Mind you, I think that earlier version was a lot *saner*--namespaces are going to be pretty bleeping useless if this isn't standardized--but that's not DAV's fault.) -- /=============================================================\ |John Stracke | My opinions are my own | S/MIME & HTML OK | |francis@ecal.com|============================================| |Chief Scientist | NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed | |eCal Corp. | by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch | \=============================================================/Received on Thursday, 1 April 1999 10:10:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:49 GMT