W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 1998

RE: Execute rights

From: <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 13:40:16 -0500
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Message-ID: <852566BF.006700F5.00@us.ibm.com>


Sounds good to me.





w3c-dist-auth@w3.org on 11/17/98 11:42:14 AM

To:   "'Joe Orton'" <jeo101@york.ac.uk>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
cc:    (bcc: Jim Amsden/Raleigh/IBM)
Subject:  RE: Execute rights




This seems to be fairly useful -- of course, the ACL protocol does allow
for
extension of the access control rights by adding XML namespacse, if the WG
as a whole doesn't want to do "execute" rights.  Any other input on this
one?

Lisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Orton [mailto:jeo101@york.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 6:56 AM
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Subject: Execute rights



Would it be a good idea to add 'execute' rights to the ACL protocol, to
indicate whether a principal is allowed to execute a resource (e.g.
CGI scripts).

Or should this be implemented as live properties? Seems more appropriate
in the ACL protocol to me.

Regards,

joe

--
Joe Orton
jeo101@york.ac.uk ... joe@orton.demon.co.uk
http://www.orton.demon.co.uk/
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 1998 13:45:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:48 GMT