RE: Execute rights

This seems to be fairly useful -- of course, the ACL protocol does allow for
extension of the access control rights by adding XML namespacse, if the WG
as a whole doesn't want to do "execute" rights.  Any other input on this
one?

Lisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Orton [mailto:jeo101@york.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 6:56 AM
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Subject: Execute rights



Would it be a good idea to add 'execute' rights to the ACL protocol, to
indicate whether a principal is allowed to execute a resource (e.g.
CGI scripts).

Or should this be implemented as live properties? Seems more appropriate
in the ACL protocol to me.

Regards,

joe

-- 
Joe Orton
jeo101@york.ac.uk ... joe@orton.demon.co.uk
http://www.orton.demon.co.uk/