W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 1998

RE: Execute rights

From: Lisa Lippert (Dusseault) (Exchange) <lisal@exchange.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 08:40:49 -0800
Message-ID: <BFF90FB6CF66D111BF4F0000F840DB8506062169@LASSIE>
To: "'Joe Orton'" <jeo101@york.ac.uk>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
This seems to be fairly useful -- of course, the ACL protocol does allow for
extension of the access control rights by adding XML namespacse, if the WG
as a whole doesn't want to do "execute" rights.  Any other input on this
one?

Lisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Orton [mailto:jeo101@york.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 6:56 AM
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Subject: Execute rights



Would it be a good idea to add 'execute' rights to the ACL protocol, to
indicate whether a principal is allowed to execute a resource (e.g.
CGI scripts).

Or should this be implemented as live properties? Seems more appropriate
in the ACL protocol to me.

Regards,

joe

-- 
Joe Orton
jeo101@york.ac.uk ... joe@orton.demon.co.uk
http://www.orton.demon.co.uk/
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 1998 11:42:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:48 GMT