I agree with the choice of a special request header. I believe it is likely that the "PIN" method will be replaced with a property update, so the request header that would make GETPROP and PUTPROP refer to the reference itself rather than the reference target is a preferable (in addition to being more general) solution than any special handling of a "PIN" method. Cheers, Geoff From: "Slein, Judith A" <JSlein@crt.xerox.com> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 09:28:11 -0500 My preference would be for the latter: by default, any method on a direct reference would be passed through, but some header on the request would make the method affect the reference itself. I think we would still say that DELETE, MOVE, and COPY always affect the reference, never its target.Received on Tuesday, 3 November 1998 22:09:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:48 GMT