W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 1998

Re: Direct References in the Advanced Collections Requirements

From: John Stracke <francis@netscape.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 13:51:33 -0700
Message-ID: <3602C7D4.73D318A0@netscape.com>
To: "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
"Slein, Judith A" wrote:

> We are still wrestling with the terminology for this distinction.  I've had
> objections in private correspondence to Client-Side / Server-Side, because
> they seem to imply something about the location of the requester that
> irrelevant to the distinction we are trying to make.

I disagree on this point, actually; in the HTTP conversation, the entity
issuing the request is the client by definition, regardless of where that
entity is running.

> Or stick with Indirect Reference / Direct Reference

I still prefer these two, myself; I'd go along with Client-Side/Server-Side,
but the others seem too contrived.

--
/====================================================================\
|John (Francis) Stracke    |My opinions are my own.|S/MIME supported |
|Software Retrophrenologist|=========================================|
|Netscape Comm. Corp.      | Organ transplants are best left to the  |
|francis@netscape.com      |  professionals.                         |
\====================================================================/
New area code for work number: 650
Received on Friday, 18 September 1998 16:51:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:47 GMT