W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 1998

RE: etag in untagged production of If header

From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:26:29 -0700
Message-ID: <3FF8121C9B6DD111812100805F31FC0D087925C9@RED-MSG-59>
To: "'Jim Amsden'" <jamsden@us.ibm.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
I could also probably come up with some fairly convoluted example where you
could use an untagged If header with an e-tag on a Depth Infinity method but
that would be besides the point. The real point is that we generally don't
ban something unless we have a reason to. Since we didn't have a compelling
reason to keep e-tags out of untagged lists and there is occasion that they
could actually be useful in an untagged list, we decided to just allow them.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Amsden [mailto:jamsden@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 1998 4:20 PM
> To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> Subject: Re: etag in untagged production of If header
> My interpretation of the No-tag-list production in an If 
> header is that is is
> used for those cases where the condition (a list of state 
> tokens and/or e-tags)
> applies to the (single) target resource of the request 
> method, no other
> resource is effected. The Tagged-list production is for 
> methods that effect
> more than one resource and therefore need to provide matching 
> conditions for
> each.
Received on Tuesday, 15 September 1998 03:26:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:18 UTC