W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 1998

RE: 11.1 activelock element

From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 13:33:59 -0800
Message-ID: <3FF8121C9B6DD111812100805F31FC0D0113C881@red-msg-59.dns.microsoft.com>
To: "'Dylan Barrell'" <dbarrell@opentext.ch>, "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Based on consensus created in this group since the release of the last
version of the specification the DTD for activelock is now:
	<!ELEMENT activelock (locktype, lockscope, depth, owner?, timeout?,
locktoken?) >

locktype, lockscope, and depth are not optional because if all are not
specified then the lock information will be inaccurate. As such if a server
does not wish to return one of those three elements then it MUST NOT return
the activelock entry at all, which of course, is its right.

		Yaron

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Dylan Barrell [SMTP:dbarrell@opentext.ch]
> Sent:	Monday, February 09, 1998 7:35 AM
> To:	'WebDAV'
> Subject:	11.1 activelock element
> 
> surely this element should be defined as follows
> 
> <!ELEMENT activelock (locktype?, lockscope?, depth?, owner?, timeout?,
> locktoken?) >
> 
> as the server is free to withold any of this information.
> 
> Cheers
> Dylan
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 1998 16:34:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:44 GMT