W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 1997

Re: RE: proposal for ordered collections

From: Sankar Virdhagriswaran <sv@crystaliz.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 16:29:43 -0500
Message-ID: <00a801bd01c4$e748fd20$d1acddcf@boxboro.crystaliz.com>
To: "Del Jensen" <DCJENSEN@novell.com>, <jdavis@parc.xerox.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

I hope we don't arbitrarily limit collections (such as the ordered
collection proposal under consideration does). Just as Xerox needs ordered
collections for compound documents we need a different type of ordered
collections for configurations and for alternates.

I like Jim's proposal (atleast conceptually) in this regard.

Received on Friday, 5 December 1997 16:25:31 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ellis Cohen: "Re: proposal for ordered collections"
Previous message: Jim Whitehead: "FTP mail archive now available"
Maybe in reply to: David G. Durand: "RE: proposal for ordered collections"
Next in thread: Stephen Martin: "Re: proposal for ordered collections"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:44 GMT