RE: collection with ordered members

At 11:16 AM 10/24/97 PDT, Yaron Goland wrote:
>Furthermore, the issue is not one of a simple "magic bullet" and all of a
>sudden all servers are able to support compound documents. There are two
>steps to this process. First the server has to understand the particular
>compound document format the client is using THEN the server has to support
>the compound document features. So discovery MUST occur, first for the
>document format and then for the compound document features.
>
No, I was supposing that the burden would be on the client to transform the
compound document into members of a collection before submitting it to the
server.  That's why I suggest defining a body for the MKCOL that a DAV
server would be required to support.  

--Judy