- From: -=jack=- <jack@twaxx.twaxx.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 1997 09:45:34 -0700
- To: Dylan Barrell <dbarrell@opentext.ch>, "'w3c-dist-auth@w3.org '" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
It should be more closely specified what happens with the lock on a resource if it is moved and the cannot be maintained. This is especially important with multi-resource locks. In this case I believe it would be better to require the MOVE to fail. ------------------------ I agree that the move should probably fail if locks can't be maintained on whatever the logical resource is, be it singular or otherwise. If not it means that moving a resource, which should be a non issue, can be very dangerous to the maintenance of content, which doesn't seem very sensible to me... -=jack=- (This text composed by voice) --
Received on Monday, 1 September 1997 12:47:20 UTC