W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 1997

Re: range locking not used in GroupWise

From: Gregory J. Woodhouse <gjw@wnetc.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 17:05:31 -0800 (PST)
To: Steve Carter <SRCarter@GW.NOVELL.COM>
cc: masinter@parc.xerox.com, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.95.970225170229.2414B-100000@shellx.best.com>
This is interesting. Byte ranges are indpendently cacheable, as are
multiple representations of the same resource, but unless I'm
misunderstanding something fundamental, they don't have URIs. It seems here
that the difficulty comes from the assumption that a lockable resource must
be uniquely identified through a URI.

---
gjw@wnetc.com    /    http://www.wnetc.com/home.html
If you're going to reinvent the wheel, at least try to come
up with a better one.
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 1997 20:12:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:42 GMT