> What I'm leading up to is that I think WEBDAV needs an infrastructure > sub-group. The infrastructure group would not be involved > with developing DAV protocols, per se, but would focus on developing > specifications for protocol extensions, ACLs and the like. Agreed. I'd be interested in a WG on that subject and would even be interested in contributing to its formation. I wonder how other people on this list feel? JonReceived on Thursday, 1 May 1997 17:54:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:42 GMT