- From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 10:58:52 -0800
- To: "'Judith Slein'" <slein@wrc.xerox.com>
- Cc: "'w3c-dist-auth@w3.org'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
You read my mind. I already made that exact change to the spec. =)
Yaron
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Judith Slein [SMTP:slein@wrc.xerox.com]
>Sent: Monday, November 11, 1996 8:45 AM
>To: Yaron Goland
>Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
>Subject: RE: Attributes in Prelim DAV Spec
>
>At 03:30 PM 11/8/96 PST, Yaron Goland wrote:
>>>The case I'm pointing to is where one attribute itself has attributes.
>>>Maybe the syntax here is just http://foo/bar<Abstract><Author>, where
>>><Author> identifies the person who wrote the <Abstract> attribute of the
>>>bar
>>>resource.
>>>
>>>[Yaron Goland] This is illegal with the current syntax. It should really
>>>be
>>>done with Abstract.Author. Still that is not a clean solution. I have no
>>>problem extending the syntax to handle this case. Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>Then let me propose that we make the syntax I used above legal for
>identifying attributes of attributes. It probably should be legal to nest
>attributes as deep as you like, although it's hard to imagine really wanting
>to go deeper than two levels.
>
>URI = (absoluteURI | relativeURI) *("<" Attribute ">") ["#" fragment]
>
>--Judy
>Name: Judith A. Slein
>E-Mail: slein@wrc.xerox.com
>Phone: 8*222-5169
>Fax: (716) 265-7133
>MailStop: 128-29E
>
Received on Monday, 11 November 1996 14:05:43 UTC