W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 1996

Re: Lock timeouts revisited

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 20:42:29 PDT
To: ejw@ics.uci.edu
CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Message-Id: <96Sep29.204229pdt."2759"@golden.parc.xerox.com>

There are so many ways that different systems or configurations
accomplish lock resolution that it would be a serious mistake to bind
just one of them into the protocol. So I'm not sure what your message
is proposing.

Larry

Received on Sunday, 29 September 1996 23:42:53 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Wayne C. Gramlich: "Re: Possibly Naive Question -Reply"
Previous message: Yaron Goland: "RE: Lock timeouts revisited"
In reply to: Jim Whitehead: "Lock timeouts revisited"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:41 GMT