- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:25:52 +0200
- To: Jan Algermissen <jan.algermissen@nordsc.com>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, uri@w3.org
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Jan Algermissen <jan.algermissen@nordsc.com> wrote: > On Oct 23, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> This also does not test the fragment case. > > Fragments are not sent to the server. They are still important to consider if we want STD 66 to be the interface. And yes, I know about URI and relative references. We call URI an absolute URL and a relative reference a relative URL and together we call them URLs. We can have this discussion in whatever terminology you prefer though. The input to the parser is always going to be a relative reference, just sometimes there's no base URI. As for your last point. We have invested time and money in explaining several problems starting over four years ago. Nothing happened. I just explained how I came to the text in the URL Standard. I gave up trying to work with STD 66 because the people working on that never invested time in my problems with it and the data I had gathered (mostly studying code in implementations and writing adhoc tests) suggested it was not a suitable starting point. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2012 11:26:20 UTC