Re: non-HTTP URIs in HTTP requests

• From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
• Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:57:14 -0800
• To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• CC: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@mac.com>, mark@coactus.com, "uri@w3.org" <uri@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4B4658BA.1090303@berkeley.edu>

hello.

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> I still think it's 
> unlikely that, per httpRange-14 resolution, 200 responses will be 
> appropriate for geo-scheme URIs.

so you're interpretation of 
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/httpRange-14/2007-05-31/HttpRange-14 is 
that it applies to any URI? the title "Dereferencing HTTP URIs" to me 
suggests it doesn't, and it's mostly a document for the semweb world 
where people wanted to have a well-defined way of how to use HTTP URIs 
for ease of implementation, without sacrificing the guarantee that 
everything can be accessed via HTTP. my view of that document is that it 
only applies to HTTP URIs, but i don't think it clearly says what it is 
about.

cheers,

dret.

Received on Thursday, 7 January 2010 21:58:14 UTC