W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > September 2009

RE: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes

From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 21:53:54 +0200
To: "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "'URI'" <uri@w3.org>, <hybi@ietf.org>, <uri-review@ietf.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9102D21CB1354229969F7A2802F43F89@POCZTOWIEC>
Ian, you are already going out of your way to make HTML back into XML.  You
are swimming against the current.  A noble exercise, I must admit, but
hardly worth the effort in this case :-)
Cheers,
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:uri-review-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Ian Hickson
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 12:46 PM
To: URI; hybi@ietf.org; uri-review@ietf.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes

> The source file that you feed into xml2rfc is an XML file using the 
> RFC2629bis syntax. You control that file. Put into it what you need.

There's no such file; the XML is generated by a script and posted straight 
to the xml2rfc Web service. I have every intention of keeping this as 
automatic as possible; I already have to go out of my way to make the 
references to [WEBADDRESSES] and [HTML5] work, I really don't want to have 
to start doing the same for IETF documents when I don't actually have to.
Received on Saturday, 5 September 2009 19:54:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:42 GMT