W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > September 2009

RE: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes

From: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:05:54 +0200
To: "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "'URI'" <uri@w3.org>, <hybi@ietf.org>, <uri-review@ietf.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B7F41174BCDB4AA2B5C464C9473F0DAF@POCZTOWIEC>
URI restrictions are not an anachronism.  Imagine an Englishman with no
knowledge of Japanese and no pocket translator to access a resource under a
Japanese IRI that he has printed on paper.  Good luck with that.
Best regards,
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:uri-review-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Ian Hickson
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 9:55 PM
To: URI; hybi@ietf.org; uri-review@ietf.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] [hybi] ws: and wss: schemes

> I've found that confusion tends to surround when an IRI is 
> happily being an IRI and when it needs to be mapped down to a URI.

I'm still confused as to why we still have URIs at all. They're such an 
anachronism.
Received on Friday, 4 September 2009 20:06:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:42 GMT