W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2009

Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI

From: Steve Suehring <suehring@braingia.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:53:31 -0500
To: uri-review@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <20091012175331.GA3277@braingia.org>
I don't think that the http URI prefix is a good solution for the ssh 
protocol.  There is too much room for userland confusion which is 
undesirable due to the nature of ssh traffic.

Steve


On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 01:01:34PM -0400, David Booth wrote:
> I don't see a need to define a new URI scheme for this.  You can just
> define an http URI prefix for this purpose, as described in
> http://dbooth.org/2006/urn2http/
> 
> Furthermore, as Graham Klyne suggested during a similar discussion
> earlier, "an HTTP URI can also retrieve a protocol [handler]
> implementation"
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2009Sep/0029.html
> This could dramatically improve the adoption rate of a new protocol.
> 
> David Booth
> 
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 17:59:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:42 GMT