> While we're here, I'd like again to plug the provision of partial template > expansion, as found in Bob's Addressable Ruby library. I find myself > wanting it in Joe's Python library now! The spec could cover it (perhaps as > an optional feature) to encourage its wider implementation. Herm... I think I'd like to add that I while I would consider my implementation useful, it is by no means elegant. Regardless of the changes to the spec, it's a feature my library will keep, but I'm not 100% certain that it's something that the spec needs to address. I wouldn't object if it does, but I don't think it's necessary. Bob AmanReceived on Monday, 1 June 2009 17:22:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 1 June 2009 17:22:22 GMT