Bill McQuillan wrote on 2/4/09: > In section 6.1 - Rules for Lexical Equivalent[sic] > This seems to contradict the specification that a date-time refers to the > last instant that could be encompassed by the accuracy given. Thus, I would > expect that YYYY would be equivalent to YYYY12 which would be equivalent to > YYYY1231, etc. > Note that YYYY02 would either be equivalent to YYYY0228 or YYYY0229 > depending on YYYY. I had made a change to the spec -- to use the "last" instant instead of the "first", but I apparently didn't catch all the dependent places. http://larry.masinter.net/duri.xml has editor's update; I'll wait a bit before posting a new version. Thanks! Larry -- http://larry.masinter.netReceived on Thursday, 5 February 2009 01:13:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 5 February 2009 01:13:28 GMT