W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > August 2009

Re: [hybi] [Uri-review] ws: and wss: schemes

From: Chris Anderson <jchris@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:52:52 -0700
Message-ID: <e282921e0908071552g1128d177xea3937292b26952d@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>, uri-review@ietf.org, hybi@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Maciej Stachowiak<mjs@apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 7, 2009, at 1:22 AM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
>> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>>> 1) What does a "ws" URI identify?
>>
>> Note also that ws is commonly used to denote Web Service.
>
> I think it's unlikely the "ws" family of formats and protocols will want to
> register their own URI scheme. That being said, how about "wsp" for
> WebSocket Protocol?

As long as we are throwing out acronyms, my suggestion would be for
the simple "websocket" or maybe "websock" if bytes are considered
expensive. I'm a big fan of the mailto: link b/c it's easy to
understand what it means.

Cheers,
Chris


-- 
Chris Anderson
http://jchrisa.net
http://couch.io
Received on Friday, 7 August 2009 22:53:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:42 GMT