Re: percent-encoding in tel URIs

Clive D.W. Feather wrote:

>> it could be simple enough for an erratum.
> I think it suffices.

After that it's up to Erik to "port" the result to the
new terminology for the sms: scheme.  <uric> is tricky.

> I was reading 2396

Meanwhile Roy said it is no issue.  He only needed a
year or so until I finally understood <pchar> for the
"porting" business.

 Frank