Tim Bray wrote: > I'm not enthusiastic about writing standards unless there's > an obvious pain point that needs to be addressed. The IRI-bis draft has an improved classification of Unicode code points, but as already noted elsewhere, it would make sense to wait for IDNAbis for the really difficult point in IRIs, the <ihost>. And of course 3987bis (excl. "LEIRI") should be promoted on standards track to "draft standard". FrankReceived on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 23:51:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:41 GMT