W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > June 2008

Re: Error handling in URIs

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:50:26 +0200
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.uc84ici764w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:44:32 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:
> Well, the URI spec doesn't need to. It's an error.
>
> If HTML5 spec needs to define the behavior because that's what the UAs  
> do, that's fine and can be done there.

This would mean that XMLHttpRequest and most likely CSS and related specs  
all need to define that or reference HTML5 if they don't want to do it  
themselves.


>> The second is with IRIs and character encodings other than UTF-8. While  
>> browsers reliably encode non-ASCII characters in the path using UTF-8,  
>> non-ASCII characters in the query component are encoded using the  
>> document's character encoding, and not UTF-8, which is incompatible  
>> with how the IRI spec defines things.
>
> Could you please be more specific? Any URI is a IRI, so a query  
> component based on an encoding other than UTF-8 still is a legal IRI.

It's also transmitted as another encoding than UTF-8 (while the path  
component _is_ transmitted as UTF-8).


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 11:51:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:41 GMT