W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2008

RE: URIs for the standard output and input streams

From: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:31:55 -0500
To: <tbray@textuality.com>
Cc: "'Colin Paul Adams'" <colin@colina.demon.co.uk>, <uri@w3.org>
Message-ID: <071501c85594$d9a02110$0702a8c0@Guides.local>

Tim Bray write:
> Well, URI schemes are expensive.  Lots of widely-deployed 
> software dispatches on the scheme.  Lots of people, like me 
> for example, tend to grumble about introducing new ones, let 
> alone three new ones to identify a single class of object.  -Tim

Yeah, I tend to agree, just thought I'd air what came to mind when you
mentioned it.

BTW, I notice you didn't weigh in on the discussion about adding a geoloc:
scheme.  Did you miss that discussion?

-- 
-Mike Schinkel
http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/
http://www.welldesignedurls.org
http://atlanta-web.org 
Received on Sunday, 13 January 2008 03:32:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:40 GMT