W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2007

Re: URI Templates - optional variables?

From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:33:47 +0200
Message-Id: <17649307-17F2-43E6-9B5A-1FCA3F8D662E@greenbytes.de>
Cc: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>, uri@w3.org
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>


Am 15.10.2007 um 21:46 schrieb James M Snell:

> I would much rather define a limited core set of <op>'s that cover the
> most basic and most common cases and include in that set a special  
> <op>
> code that indicates that the remainder of the token is going to be in
> some application-specific or extension syntax.

Yes, that was the gist of my proposal. What exact syntax that should  
be is not a priority as long as it is readable. The current proposals  
looked a bit perl-ish, so I dared to provide an different approach.

And i think it would be cool to associate template functions with  
http resources which give the same value.

//Stefan

--
Stefan Eissing

<green/>bytes GmbH
Hafenweg 16
D-48155 Münster
Germany
Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2007 09:34:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:37 GMT