Re: Template URIs vs. URIs

On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:27 AM, Mark Baker wrote:

> I'd recommend that the template URI syntax use a more significant
> change to avoid this confusion.  Starting with a non-scheme character
> ("@"?) might be one way.  Or, given how detection algorithms usually
> work, replacing the colon after the scheme with another non-scheme
> character (or otherwise morphing it) would probably work.  Any
> solution that helps make it more obvious to humans and (existing)
> automata that template URIs are not URIs would be fine by me.

+1   -Tim