Frans Englich schrieb: > On Thursday 05 October 2006 20:27, Mark Baker wrote: >> Regarding >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00.txt >> >> My concern with this draft is that template URIs are not easily >> distinguishable from URIs. mnot's blog entry[1] claims that the use >> of "{}" is sufficient to distinguish the two, and while that may be >> technically true, I'm not aware of any URI-detection algorithm that >> checks for the presence of minor, unknown characters. A quick test of >> GMail shows that it presents template URIs as clickable URIs, for >> example. > > I'm not very into this, but doesn't it clash with the rather strong convention > of representing QNames(XML) with John Clark's syntax? > > http://jclark.com/xml/xmlns.htm I thought about that as well... But when would you ever want to have a URI *template* in place of a namespace URI? Best regards, JulianReceived on Thursday, 5 October 2006 19:58:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:11:49 GMT