- From: Paul Hoffman <phoffman@imc.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 09:22:56 -0700
- To: uri@w3.org
At 7:51 AM +0200 5/15/05, Frank Ellermann wrote: >McDonald, Ira wrote: > >> Umm...RFC 2396 is _obsolete_. > >Yes, and the idea is to extract all schemes from RfC 1738 into >new RfCs, and then move RfC 1738 to "historic". That's ready >for wais, prospero, and telnet. For file, ftp, gopher, news, >and nntp it's "work in progress". Just to be clear, I don't think it is a "work in progress" for either file: or nntp:. I publicly abandoned those two due to my perception that it was impossible to get consensus on them, and I don't know who (if anyone) is actively working on them. --Paul Hoffman, Director --Internet Mail Consortium
Received on Sunday, 15 May 2005 16:42:13 UTC