- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:47:39 -0800
- To: "'Martin Duerst'" <duerst@w3.org>, "'Leslie Daigle'" <leslie@thinkingcat.com>
- Cc: uri@w3.org, uri-review@ietf.org
> So my main question is what ideas and actual efforts you > are thinking about or proposing to fix the above situation. I think RFC 2434 has an interesting discussion of the role (and limitations) of "mailing list review", and the reasons why it emphasizes "designated expert" and suggests: The designated expert can initiate and coordinate as wide a review of an assignment request as may be necessary to evaluate it properly. draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guidelines-03.txt calls for "expert review" and suggests "uri@w3.org" for optional mailing list review. It's easy to change this to "uri-review@ietf.org" in the document, but we're not relying on the mailing list review as the primary filter (for the reasons laid out in RFC2434). Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2005 23:47:56 UTC